Hey guys! Ever wondered what it takes for an Overwatch player or team to get their own page on Liquipedia? It's not just about being good at the game; there's a whole system in place to determine who's notable enough. Let's dive into the criteria that Liquipedia uses to decide who makes the cut and gets immortalized in the Overwatch esports history books.

Liquipedia, for those not fully in the know, is like the Wikipedia of esports. It's a comprehensive resource for information on teams, players, tournaments, and everything else related to competitive gaming. Because it aims to be a reliable source, Liquipedia has to maintain standards for notability. They can't just create pages for every player who's ever touched Overwatch; otherwise, it would be flooded with tons of pages. This is where the notability guidelines come in.

So, what makes an Overwatch player or team notable enough for Liquipedia? Generally, it boils down to achieving a certain level of success or participation in significant tournaments. For players, this often means competing in premier Overwatch leagues like the Overwatch League (OWL) or Overwatch Contenders. Reaching these levels indicates a degree of skill and recognition within the competitive scene. Think of it like this: if you're consistently playing against the best, you're probably one of the best, or at least on your way there. For teams, qualifying for and competing in major tournaments is a key factor. This shows that the team has earned its place among the top contenders and has a track record worth documenting.

But it's not just about participating; it's also about performance. Winning a significant tournament or achieving a high ranking in a prestigious league significantly boosts a player's or team's notability. These accomplishments demonstrate a level of excellence that sets them apart from the average competitor. Liquipedia aims to document the best of the best, so these achievements are crucial. In essence, the notability guidelines help Liquipedia maintain its reputation as a reliable and informative resource by ensuring that only the most relevant and accomplished individuals and teams are included.

Core Notability Criteria

Okay, let's break down the nitty-gritty of the Overwatch Liquipedia notability criteria. What specific achievements or involvements are we talking about? What milestones do players and teams need to hit to warrant their own Liquipedia page? This is where it gets interesting, and understanding these criteria can give you a real appreciation for the competitive Overwatch scene and what it takes to stand out.

Overwatch League (OWL) participation is a major factor. If a player has played in the OWL, they're pretty much guaranteed a Liquipedia page. The OWL is the top tier of Overwatch esports, and simply making it onto a team roster is a testament to a player's skill and dedication. It signifies that they're among the elite players in the world. Not only does OWL participation grant notability, but it also brings a level of recognition that extends beyond the game itself. These players become figures in the broader esports landscape, and their careers are worth documenting.

Then there's Overwatch Contenders. Performing well in Contenders, especially in the higher regions, can also grant notability. Contenders is the tier below OWL, serving as a proving ground for aspiring pros. Consistently placing high in Contenders tournaments or winning a Contenders season can definitely catch the eye of Liquipedia editors. It demonstrates that a player or team is on the cusp of breaking into the big leagues and has the potential to make a significant impact. Contenders is where future OWL stars are often discovered, so strong performances here are a solid indicator of notability.

Beyond OWL and Contenders, participation and performance in other significant tournaments also count. This could include major third-party events, international competitions, or regional leagues with a substantial level of competition. The key is the significance of the tournament. Does it attract top teams? Does it have a large prize pool? Does it garner significant viewership? If the answer to these questions is yes, then participation in that tournament can contribute to a player's or team's notability. Think of tournaments that draw attention from the wider Overwatch community; these are the ones that matter most when it comes to Liquipedia's criteria.

It’s also important to remember that Liquipedia’s notability guidelines are always evolving. As the Overwatch esports scene changes, the criteria may be adjusted to reflect the current landscape. So, staying informed about the latest guidelines is crucial for anyone interested in tracking notability.

How Liquipedia Editors Determine Notability

So, how does it all work behind the scenes? How do Liquipedia editors actually decide whether a player or team meets the notability guidelines? What's the process they go through to evaluate a potential page and ensure that it meets the required standards? Let's pull back the curtain and take a look at the decision-making process.

First off, Liquipedia editors are typically experienced members of the Overwatch community who are passionate about the game and its competitive scene. They have a deep understanding of the various leagues, tournaments, and players, and they're dedicated to maintaining the quality and accuracy of Liquipedia's information. These editors often spend countless hours researching, writing, and editing pages to ensure that everything is up to par. They're essentially the gatekeepers of Overwatch esports history, ensuring that only the most notable individuals and teams are properly documented.

When evaluating a player or team for notability, editors will typically look at a variety of factors. They'll examine their tournament history, their performance in those tournaments, their participation in major leagues like OWL and Contenders, and any other achievements that might be relevant. They'll also consider the overall impact that the player or team has had on the Overwatch scene. Have they innovated new strategies? Have they inspired other players? Have they contributed to the growth of the community? These are all factors that can influence an editor's decision.

The process often involves discussion and collaboration among editors. If there's uncertainty about whether a player or team meets the notability guidelines, editors will often debate the merits of creating a page. They'll share their perspectives, present evidence, and try to reach a consensus. This collaborative approach helps to ensure that decisions are fair and objective. Liquipedia aims to be a community-driven resource, and this is reflected in the way notability decisions are made.

It's also important to note that Liquipedia editors are always open to feedback from the community. If you believe that a player or team deserves a page on Liquipedia, you can reach out to the editors and present your case. Provide evidence of their achievements, explain why you think they're notable, and be prepared to answer any questions that the editors may have. While there's no guarantee that your suggestion will be accepted, your input will be considered.

Examples of Notable Players and Teams

Let's get concrete. Who are some examples of Overwatch players and teams that have clearly met Liquipedia's notability standards? Looking at specific cases can help illustrate the criteria in action and give you a better sense of what it takes to earn a place on Liquipedia.

Take Jay "sinatraa" Won, for instance. Sinatraa is a former Overwatch League MVP who played for the San Francisco Shock. His OWL participation, combined with his MVP award and multiple championship wins, made him an obvious choice for a Liquipedia page. His achievements speak for themselves, and his impact on the Overwatch scene is undeniable. Sinatraa's case is a clear example of how OWL participation and exceptional performance can guarantee notability.

Then there's the San Francisco Shock as a team. They are one of the most dominant teams in Overwatch League history, with multiple championships to their name. Their consistent success and their impact on the meta-game made them a shoo-in for a Liquipedia page. The Shock's case highlights the importance of sustained success and a significant contribution to the competitive scene in achieving notability.

Another example is Kim "Proper" Dong-hyun, another Overwatch League MVP who played for the San Francisco Shock after sinatraa left the team. With his OWL participation, combined with his MVP award and multiple championship wins, made him an obvious choice for a Liquipedia page. His achievements speak for themselves, and his impact on the Overwatch scene is undeniable. Proper's case is a clear example of how OWL participation and exceptional performance can guarantee notability.

These are just a few examples, and there are many other players and teams who have earned their place on Liquipedia through their achievements and contributions to the Overwatch esports scene. By studying these examples, you can gain a better understanding of the criteria that Liquipedia uses to determine notability and the types of accomplishments that are valued.

Why Notability Matters

Why does all of this notability stuff even matter? Why does Liquipedia put so much emphasis on these guidelines? What's the point of having these standards in place? Let's explore the reasons why notability is so important for Liquipedia and for the Overwatch esports community as a whole.

For Liquipedia, notability is essential for maintaining its credibility and usefulness as a resource. By focusing on the most relevant and accomplished players and teams, Liquipedia ensures that its information is accurate, comprehensive, and valuable to its users. If Liquipedia were to include pages for every player who's ever played Overwatch, the site would become cluttered and difficult to navigate. The notability guidelines help to filter out the noise and focus on the individuals and teams that have truly made a mark on the competitive scene.

Notability also helps to preserve the history of Overwatch esports. By documenting the achievements of the most significant players and teams, Liquipedia creates a record of the past that can be accessed and studied by future generations. This is important for understanding the evolution of the game and the development of competitive strategies. Liquipedia serves as a living archive of Overwatch esports, and the notability guidelines help to ensure that this archive is accurate and comprehensive.

Beyond Liquipedia itself, notability can also have a positive impact on the players and teams that are recognized. Having a Liquipedia page can boost their visibility, attract new fans, and enhance their professional reputation. It can also serve as a valuable resource for potential sponsors and organizations looking to invest in Overwatch esports. In a competitive and rapidly evolving scene, every bit of recognition counts, and Liquipedia can play a significant role in helping players and teams stand out.

In conclusion, Overwatch Liquipedia notability is a crucial aspect of maintaining a high-quality, informative, and credible resource for the Overwatch esports community. It ensures that the most deserving players and teams are recognized and that the history of the game is accurately preserved. So, the next time you're browsing Liquipedia, take a moment to appreciate the notability guidelines and the editors who work tirelessly to uphold them. They're playing a vital role in shaping the narrative of Overwatch esports.